<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    
    <title>podOmatic forum thread: Question about top 100 music podcasts</title>
    <link>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17010</link>
    <description>podOmatic Forums thread Re: Question about top 100 music podcasts</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>podOmatic RSS Generator</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Question about top 100 music podcasts</title>
      <description>Just wondering how some of the podcasts get on the top 100?
I understand its based on your feeds, but given many aren't on  pro and have 40+ minute podcasts, I can't see how they can get the amount of feed views and downloads to be in top 100 and not go way over the basic limit of bandwidth.

Can anyone share there feed views and downloads who are in top 100 or been in?
I'm not saying any of the podcasts aren't good enough for the top 100, I just don't see how those who aren't pro's with mixes that are about an Hour long are making it.

These are my stats as of Friday 2:28
                  This Week     Last Week
Page views [?]  	214	182
Feed views [?]    	2195	2958
Downloads [?] 	       	1398	1202
Unique visitors [?] 	66	72
Subscribers [?] 	454	537

</description>
      <guid>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17010</guid>
      <comments>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17010</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17010</link>
      <dc:creator>dj-grant</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about top 100 music podcasts</title>
      <description>Rankings are currently based solely on uniques and subscribers.  We basically just add the two numbers and sort by that "score".  

In the near future, rankings will change dramatically because we will be excluding hits from automated systems (web crawlers, spiders, etc), so podcasts getting many crawler hits but few human hits (people using browsers, iTunes, etc) will drop in the rankings and podcasts getting many people but few search engines will rise.</description>
      <guid>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17011</guid>
      <comments>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17011</comments>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17011</link>
      <dc:creator>jdossey</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about top 100 music podcasts</title>
      <description>"uniques" meaning "unique visitors". Thus, if you and a thousand of your buddies "visit" your page daily AND subscribe to it, you may well get high in the daily ratings but much lower in the overall ratings - overlap being discounted. 

I don't know how to manage my automated visits, nor even how to discover what those numbers are or how mine compare to everyone else's. Will my ratings change significantly? My audience will not, and that's what really matters to me.
Dave M

</description>
      <guid>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17028</guid>
      <comments>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17028</comments>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.podOmatic.com/forumpost/show/17028</link>
      <dc:creator>meyer</dc:creator>
    </item>
    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
  </channel>
</rss>
